Netanya Solar Roof Tile Project: 407 Tiles, One Integrated Roof

Most solar roof projects start with the same question: can you generate power without turning the building into a power station? This case study walks through a real BIPV project in Netanya, Israel, where 407 curved solar tiles replaced an aging roof and started producing electricity in a single build — no racks, no drilling, no separate waterproofing layer.

The numbers come from the system’s live monitoring, not lab estimates. I will share what worked, what was tricky, and why the owner chose curved tiles over flat panels even though flat panels promise more watts per unit.

The existing roof before BIPV renewal. Faded and broken tiles on a four-aspect residential roof that had reached the end of its service life.

Why the Owner Was Looking for an Alternative

The house sits in Netanya, a coastal city north of Tel Aviv. The original roof tiles were faded and broken, and a renewal was due — a job that typically runs $20,000 to $30,000 in the region. At the same time, the owner wanted to start generating solar power.

Three problems came up in early discussions:

• Rack-mounted panels would damage the roof. Conventional panels are drilled through the roof structure, raising leak risk and clashing with the building’s Mediterranean styling.
• Panels and tiles age on different clocks. Roof tiles fail long before the panels do. Renewing the roof later means removing the panels first — extra cost, extra work, and downtime.
• Looks and clean power rarely come together. Owners who care about curb appeal simply will not accept metal racks and exposed panels on a residential roof.

The brief was clear: clean energy without giving up the roofline, the looks, or the waterproofing. That ruled out conventional panels from the start.

Project Scope and Success Metrics

Before any product was selected, we defined the boundaries of the job and the numbers that would count as success.

Success was defined by three measurable targets:

• 407 tiles — full tiling complete across all four aspects.
• 28,490 kWh per year — annual yield target met.
• Original roof untouched — complete roof renewal without demolition.

All three had to be met together. Hitting the yield target with a damaged roof would not count. A perfect-looking roof with low output would not count either.

The Solution: Triple-Arch Solar Tiles

We selected GreenMore’s triple-arch solar tiles for this project. Three reasons drove the choice:

• The tile is the roof. No racks, no drilling. Tiles are laid just like ordinary roof tiles, course by course from the eaves up. Fitting tiles handle the ridge and eaves transitions.
• Curved profile suits Mediterranean styling. The three-arch shape reads as a traditional roof across all four aspects, rather than a grid of flat panels bolted on top.
• Integrated waterproofing. The solar tile itself becomes the new waterproof layer. Single-tile replacement is possible, and the ventilated rear keeps cells cool.

System configuration

We did consider flat tiles with optimizers. Flat tiles give more watts per unit, but the racked look and the separate waterproofing layer fell short of the brief. After evaluation, we held to the integrated curved-tile route. Looks and waterproofing were hard constraints; output was optimised within them.

Construction in progress. Curved solar tiles being laid across the four-aspect roof, course by course from the eaves upward.

Fixing battens and tile placement detail. The existing roof structure was left intact underneath the new solar tiles.

Construction Timeline

The build ran in six stages, delivered by a single crew from survey to commissioning:

The Hard Parts and How We Handled Them

1. Balancing output across four aspects

A four-aspect roof means each face receives very different sunlight. The north face gets the least, the south face the most. If you wire them carelessly, the weakest face drags the whole string down.

The fix was thoughtful string sizing — grouping tiles by aspect and wiring them so the weaker faces do not bottleneck the stronger ones. The gentle 8° pitch helps here too: at such a shallow angle, every aspect sees relatively even light throughout the day. Average daily yield settled at 74.8 kWh across all four faces.

2. Keeping the roof fully watertight

No drilling, no racks. Fitting tiles handle the ridge and eaves transitions, and the solar tiles themselves become the new waterproof layer. The existing roof was left untouched underneath — no demolition, no exposure to weather during the build. The system meets EN 14782 requirements for self-supporting metal sheets used in roofing.

3. The curved-tile trade-off

Flat tiles generate more watts per unit. That is a fact. But on this roof, the racked look and the separate waterproofing requirement did not meet the brief. The owner’s priorities were clear: roofline unity and waterproofing came first, output came second. Within those constraints, the curved-tile route delivered a stronger overall result.

The completed BIPV roof. 407 triple-arch solar tiles covering all four aspects, with integrated waterproofing and a seamless roofline.

Results: Before and After

Investment and payback

The payback number changes dramatically once you count the roof renewal as a line the owner was going to pay regardless. Solar tiles replace that cost rather than adding to it. That is the real economics of a BIPV roof replacement.

Live monitoring data from October 9, 2026. PV power (yellow) peaks past 11 kW at midday, battery (green) stores surplus and discharges in the evening to cover the household load (purple).

What the Live Monitoring Shows

These figures come from the system’s own monitoring app, recorded on a clear day in early October:

• Midday (12:41): 35.30 kWh generated so far that day. Battery at 98%, solar feeding 11.43 kW into the system.
• Power curve peak: 91.46 kWh total for the day — a clear day can top 90 kWh.
• Evening (20:03): 74.80 kWh total generation. Solar at zero, battery discharging at 3.61 kW to cover the 3.60 kW load. Grid draw: 7 W.

Four aspects at about 8° pitch. The string sizing and the shallow angle close the gap between faces, so no single aspect becomes a bottleneck. The daily average of 74.8 kWh is what the system delivers consistently, not just on its best day.

Triple-Arch Tiles vs Conventional Panels

Both options generate power. The difference is what else you get: waterproofing, a renewed roof, and a building that still looks like a house. The International Energy Agency’s Solar Energy Buildings programme (Task 66) notes that building-integrated PV is growing fastest in markets where appearance and building code compliance matter — exactly the conditions on this project.

Three Things This Project Taught Us

One line: not just a generating roof, but a complete answer for looks, waterproofing, and returns. If your roof is due for renewal and you are considering solar, the two decisions do not have to be made separately.